<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Economics 101</title>
	<atom:link href="http://economic101.wordpress.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://economic101.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>This blog was created to help people understand what is happening in our complex global economy.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 16:36:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<cloud domain='economic101.wordpress.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

			<item>
		<title>Unemployment Rate Now Over 10 Percent</title>
		<link>http://economic101.wordpress.com/2009/11/06/unemployment-rate-now-over-10-percent/</link>
		<comments>http://economic101.wordpress.com/2009/11/06/unemployment-rate-now-over-10-percent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 16:36:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sbalassi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://economic101.wordpress.com/?p=444</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
The unemployed rate jumped to 10.2 (from 9.8 percent) percent last month, the highest since April 1983. The economy shed a net total of 190,000 jobs.
The number of unemployed hit 15.7 million, up from 15.1 million. The job losses occurred across most industries, from manufacturing and construction to retail and financial. The job-loss total is [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=economic101.wordpress.com&blog=6122294&post=444&subd=economic101&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><br /><div id="TixyyLink">
<p>The unemployed rate jumped to 10.2 (from 9.8 percent) percent last month, the highest since April 1983. The economy shed a net total of 190,000 jobs.</p>
<p>The number of unemployed hit 15.7 million, up from 15.1 million. The job losses occurred across most industries, from manufacturing and construction to retail and financial. The job-loss total is based on a survey of businesses, separate from a survey of households that produces the unemployment rate.</p>
</div>
  <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/economic101.wordpress.com/444/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/economic101.wordpress.com/444/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/economic101.wordpress.com/444/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/economic101.wordpress.com/444/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/economic101.wordpress.com/444/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/economic101.wordpress.com/444/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/economic101.wordpress.com/444/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/economic101.wordpress.com/444/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/economic101.wordpress.com/444/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/economic101.wordpress.com/444/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=economic101.wordpress.com&blog=6122294&post=444&subd=economic101&ref=&feed=1" /></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://economic101.wordpress.com/2009/11/06/unemployment-rate-now-over-10-percent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/77327d371c2beaa0c915764f5879fe79?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2Fa.wordpress.com%2Fi%2Fmu.gif&#38;r=PG" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">sbalassi</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pay-as-you-go Driving in California</title>
		<link>http://economic101.wordpress.com/2009/11/03/pay-as-you-go-driving-in-california/</link>
		<comments>http://economic101.wordpress.com/2009/11/03/pay-as-you-go-driving-in-california/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 19:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sbalassi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://economic101.wordpress.com/?p=442</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the Sacramento Bee:
Car insurance by the tankful?
Not quite, but California moved a step closer last month to pay-as-you-drive policies that could allow motorists to buy insurance like they do gasoline – a little at a time.
Insurance Commissioner Steve Poizner released regulations permitting and authorizing mileage verification for pay-as-you-drive, without dictating what form such plans must [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=economic101.wordpress.com&blog=6122294&post=442&subd=economic101&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><br /><p>From the <a href="http://www.sacbee.com/topstories/story/2300940.html">Sacramento Bee</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://get.lingospot.com/link/?@li2=2240&amp;is_lhid=1&amp;key=ATPUCNWCXV&amp;portal_key=3_Sacbee&amp;ps_id=EmsFtMpSFt&amp;q=QQ:lqOTqjptCQHP{{@HIPIORJJOGDPOHPDVOqptJ:pnCDOqmj_J:pnCIO4aJm8CIAHRA:GAHUKVV&amp;section_key=&amp;site_id=&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ftopics.sacbee.com%2FCar%2Binsurance%2F&amp;url_key=_TaCSO0CGBAP:G:UBK&amp;v=1&amp;~boot=1257274931444">Car insurance</a> by the tankful?</p>
<p>Not quite, but <a rel="nofollow" href="http://topics.sacbee.com/California/">California</a> moved a step closer last month to pay-as-you-drive policies that could allow motorists to buy insurance like they do gasoline – a little at a time.</p>
<p>Insurance Commissioner <a rel="nofollow" href="http://topics.sacbee.com/Steve+Poizner/">Steve Poizner</a> released regulations permitting and authorizing mileage verification for pay-as-you-drive, without dictating what form such plans must take.</p>
<p>The goal is to use per-mile pricing to entice Californians not to drive so much, thus easing <a rel="nofollow" href="http://topics.sacbee.com/air+pollution/">air pollution,</a> relieving <a rel="nofollow" href="http://topics.sacbee.com/traffic+congestion/">traffic congestion</a> and lowering the number of traffic collisions.</p></blockquote>
  <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/economic101.wordpress.com/442/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/economic101.wordpress.com/442/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/economic101.wordpress.com/442/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/economic101.wordpress.com/442/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/economic101.wordpress.com/442/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/economic101.wordpress.com/442/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/economic101.wordpress.com/442/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/economic101.wordpress.com/442/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/economic101.wordpress.com/442/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/economic101.wordpress.com/442/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=economic101.wordpress.com&blog=6122294&post=442&subd=economic101&ref=&feed=1" /></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://economic101.wordpress.com/2009/11/03/pay-as-you-go-driving-in-california/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/77327d371c2beaa0c915764f5879fe79?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2Fa.wordpress.com%2Fi%2Fmu.gif&#38;r=PG" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">sbalassi</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>All Books Under 10 Dollars</title>
		<link>http://economic101.wordpress.com/2009/11/03/all-books-under-10-dollars/</link>
		<comments>http://economic101.wordpress.com/2009/11/03/all-books-under-10-dollars/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 16:36:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sbalassi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://economic101.wordpress.com/?p=440</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Hillel Italie, Associated Press:
NEW YORK — The book price wars are no longer just for pre-orders.Amazon.com was offering hardcovers of John Grisham&#8217;s Ford County and Barbara Kingsolver&#8217;s The Lacuna for just $9 on Tuesday, the official release date for both books. Hardcovers generally have a list price of $24 or higher.
In mid-October, Walmart.com announced dramatic [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=economic101.wordpress.com&blog=6122294&post=440&subd=economic101&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><br /><div id="byLineTag"><a href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/media/2009-11-03-book-prices_N.htm">By Hillel Italie, Associated Press</a>:</div>
<blockquote><p>NEW YORK — The book price wars are no longer just for pre-orders.<a title="More news, photos about Amazon.com" href="http://content.usatoday.com/topics/topic/Organizations/Companies/Technology/Services/Amazon.com">Amazon.com</a> was offering hardcovers of <a title="More news, photos about John Grisham" href="http://content.usatoday.com/topics/topic/People/Celebrities/Authors/John+Grisham">John Grisham</a>&#8217;s <em>Ford County</em> and Barbara Kingsolver&#8217;s <em>The Lacuna</em> for just $9 on Tuesday, the official release date for both books. Hardcovers generally have a list price of $24 or higher.</p>
<p>In mid-October, Walmart.com announced dramatic discounts for pre-orders of <em>Ford County</em>, <a title="More news, photos about Sarah Palin" href="http://content.usatoday.com/topics/topic/People/Politicians,+Government+Officials,+Strategists/Governors,+Mayors/Sarah+Palin">Sarah Palin</a>&#8217;s <em>Going Rogue</em> and other popular November publications. Wal-Mart.com initially charged $9 for the books, a price quickly matched by Amazon.com, then dropped to $8.98 by Wal-Mart.com.</p>
<p>Authors, publishers and rival booksellers worry that cutting the price so low will harm competition and force down the cost of books overall, leading to a reduction in author advances.</p></blockquote>
<p>Great news for book buyers, just in time for the holidays. Will these new prices <em>really </em>drive authors out of the book business and give us less to read?</p>
  <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/economic101.wordpress.com/440/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/economic101.wordpress.com/440/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/economic101.wordpress.com/440/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/economic101.wordpress.com/440/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/economic101.wordpress.com/440/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/economic101.wordpress.com/440/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/economic101.wordpress.com/440/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/economic101.wordpress.com/440/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/economic101.wordpress.com/440/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/economic101.wordpress.com/440/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=economic101.wordpress.com&blog=6122294&post=440&subd=economic101&ref=&feed=1" /></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://economic101.wordpress.com/2009/11/03/all-books-under-10-dollars/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/77327d371c2beaa0c915764f5879fe79?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2Fa.wordpress.com%2Fi%2Fmu.gif&#38;r=PG" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">sbalassi</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>No Stimulus for Napa Valley College</title>
		<link>http://economic101.wordpress.com/2009/10/30/no-stimulus-for-napa-valley-college/</link>
		<comments>http://economic101.wordpress.com/2009/10/30/no-stimulus-for-napa-valley-college/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 00:08:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sbalassi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://economic101.wordpress.com/?p=438</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the Sacramento Bee:
The $787 billion stimulus bill approved by Congress earlier this year has saved or created more than 640,000 jobs, including more than 100,000 in California, the White House said today.
&#8230;
Standing at Biden&#8217;s side, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger said his state has saved or created more jobs than any other state in the nation. [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=economic101.wordpress.com&blog=6122294&post=438&subd=economic101&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><br /><p>From the <a href="http://www.sacbee.com/capitolandcalifornia/story/2294874.html">Sacramento Bee</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>The $787 billion <a rel="nofollow" href="http://topics.sacbee.com/stimulus+bill/">stimulus bill</a> approved by <a rel="nofollow" href="http://topics.sacbee.com/Congress/">Congress</a> earlier this year has saved or created more than 640,000 jobs, including more than 100,000 in <a rel="nofollow" href="http://get.lingospot.com/link/?@li2=2721&amp;is_lhid=1&amp;key=ATPUCNWCXV&amp;portal_key=3_Sacbee&amp;ps_id=1eVe0g6hRv&amp;q=QQ:lqOTqjptCQZD7SI7P7AORJJOHBIOHPGVOqptJ:pnCDOqmj_J:pnCPO4aJm8CPIIRA:GGBGKVV&amp;section_key=ODVZSSPS&amp;site_id=&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ftopics.sacbee.com%2FCalifornia%2F&amp;url_key=_TaCSO0CGBS7GD_UBK&amp;v=1&amp;~boot=1256947525284">California,</a> the White House said today.</p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
<p>Standing at Biden&#8217;s side, Gov. <a rel="nofollow" href="http://topics.sacbee.com/Arnold+Schwarzenegger/">Arnold Schwarzenegger</a> said his state has saved or created more jobs than any other state in the nation. He said teachers and other educators account for more than 62,000 of <a rel="nofollow" href="http://topics.sacbee.com/California/">California&#8217;s</a> jobs, including those who might have been laid off if not for the federal stimulus money.</p></blockquote>
<p>I can tell you for a fact that it did not save any jobs at Napa Valley College.</p>
  <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/economic101.wordpress.com/438/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/economic101.wordpress.com/438/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/economic101.wordpress.com/438/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/economic101.wordpress.com/438/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/economic101.wordpress.com/438/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/economic101.wordpress.com/438/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/economic101.wordpress.com/438/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/economic101.wordpress.com/438/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/economic101.wordpress.com/438/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/economic101.wordpress.com/438/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=economic101.wordpress.com&blog=6122294&post=438&subd=economic101&ref=&feed=1" /></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://economic101.wordpress.com/2009/10/30/no-stimulus-for-napa-valley-college/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/77327d371c2beaa0c915764f5879fe79?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2Fa.wordpress.com%2Fi%2Fmu.gif&#38;r=PG" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">sbalassi</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cash for Clunkers cost me WHAT ?!?!</title>
		<link>http://economic101.wordpress.com/2009/10/29/cash-for-clunkers-cost-me-what/</link>
		<comments>http://economic101.wordpress.com/2009/10/29/cash-for-clunkers-cost-me-what/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sbalassi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://economic101.wordpress.com/?p=436</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From CNN Money:
The Cash for Clunkers program gave car buyers rebates of up to $4,500 if they traded in less fuel-efficient vehicles for new vehicles that met certain fuel economy requirements. A total of $3 billion was allotted for those rebates.
The average rebate was $4,000. But the overwhelming majority of sales would have taken place [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=economic101.wordpress.com&blog=6122294&post=436&subd=economic101&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><br /><p>From <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2009/10/28/autos/clunkers_analysis/index.htm">CNN Money</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>The Cash for Clunkers program gave car buyers rebates of up to $4,500 if they traded in less fuel-efficient vehicles for new vehicles that met certain fuel economy requirements. A total of $3 billion was allotted for those rebates.</p>
<p>The average rebate was $4,000. But the overwhelming majority of sales would have taken place anyway at some time in the last half of 2009, according to Edmunds.com. That means the government ended up spending about $24,000 each for those 125,000 additional vehicle sales.</p></blockquote>
  <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/economic101.wordpress.com/436/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/economic101.wordpress.com/436/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/economic101.wordpress.com/436/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/economic101.wordpress.com/436/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/economic101.wordpress.com/436/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/economic101.wordpress.com/436/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/economic101.wordpress.com/436/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/economic101.wordpress.com/436/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/economic101.wordpress.com/436/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/economic101.wordpress.com/436/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=economic101.wordpress.com&blog=6122294&post=436&subd=economic101&ref=&feed=1" /></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://economic101.wordpress.com/2009/10/29/cash-for-clunkers-cost-me-what/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/77327d371c2beaa0c915764f5879fe79?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2Fa.wordpress.com%2Fi%2Fmu.gif&#38;r=PG" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">sbalassi</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sports or Academics</title>
		<link>http://economic101.wordpress.com/2009/10/27/sports-or-academics/</link>
		<comments>http://economic101.wordpress.com/2009/10/27/sports-or-academics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 15:30:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sbalassi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://economic101.wordpress.com/?p=434</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some profs want Cal to stop subsidizing sports
       <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=economic101.wordpress.com&blog=6122294&post=434&subd=economic101&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><br /><p><a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/10/27/MN0L1AAUM3.DTL">Some profs want Cal to stop subsidizing sports</a></p>
  <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/economic101.wordpress.com/434/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/economic101.wordpress.com/434/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/economic101.wordpress.com/434/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/economic101.wordpress.com/434/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/economic101.wordpress.com/434/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/economic101.wordpress.com/434/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/economic101.wordpress.com/434/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/economic101.wordpress.com/434/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/economic101.wordpress.com/434/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/economic101.wordpress.com/434/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=economic101.wordpress.com&blog=6122294&post=434&subd=economic101&ref=&feed=1" /></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://economic101.wordpress.com/2009/10/27/sports-or-academics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/77327d371c2beaa0c915764f5879fe79?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2Fa.wordpress.com%2Fi%2Fmu.gif&#38;r=PG" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">sbalassi</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>More Hiring on the Way</title>
		<link>http://economic101.wordpress.com/2009/10/26/more-hiring-on-the-way/</link>
		<comments>http://economic101.wordpress.com/2009/10/26/more-hiring-on-the-way/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 18:25:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sbalassi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://economic101.wordpress.com/?p=432</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the USA Today:
For the first time since the recession began, the portion of companies planning to add employees in the next six months outnumbered those expecting to cut jobs, according to this month&#8217;s quarterly survey of economists at 78 firms by the National Association for Business Economics.
Twenty-four percent plan to grow their workforce, 20% [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=economic101.wordpress.com&blog=6122294&post=432&subd=economic101&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><br /><p>From the <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/economy/2009-10-25-economy-hiring-workers_N.htm">USA Today</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>For the first time since the recession began, the portion of companies planning to add employees in the next six months outnumbered those expecting to cut jobs, according to this month&#8217;s quarterly survey of economists at 78 firms by the National Association for Business Economics.</p>
<p>Twenty-four percent plan to grow their workforce, 20% say they&#8217;ll trim staff and 57% expect no change. In July, 18% expected to add workers, while 28% said they would scale back. &#8220;It&#8217;s a little ahead of what I was expecting,&#8221; says Ken Simonson, chief economist at the Associated General Contractors of America, who helped conduct the survey.</p></blockquote>
  <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/economic101.wordpress.com/432/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/economic101.wordpress.com/432/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/economic101.wordpress.com/432/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/economic101.wordpress.com/432/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/economic101.wordpress.com/432/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/economic101.wordpress.com/432/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/economic101.wordpress.com/432/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/economic101.wordpress.com/432/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/economic101.wordpress.com/432/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/economic101.wordpress.com/432/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=economic101.wordpress.com&blog=6122294&post=432&subd=economic101&ref=&feed=1" /></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://economic101.wordpress.com/2009/10/26/more-hiring-on-the-way/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/77327d371c2beaa0c915764f5879fe79?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2Fa.wordpress.com%2Fi%2Fmu.gif&#38;r=PG" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">sbalassi</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>4-Day Workweek Benefits</title>
		<link>http://economic101.wordpress.com/2009/10/22/4-day-workweek-benefits/</link>
		<comments>http://economic101.wordpress.com/2009/10/22/4-day-workweek-benefits/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 17:11:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sbalassi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://economic101.wordpress.com/?p=430</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the AP:
SALT LAKE CITY – Closing Utah state offices on Fridays has delivered an unexpected bonus: a big saving on overtime pay.
New calculations show Utah saved $4.1 million in the first year of a government experiment with a four-day workweek.
State employees were eager to leave after the longer workday, and weren&#8217;t inclined to work [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=economic101.wordpress.com&blog=6122294&post=430&subd=economic101&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><br /><p><a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/ut_four_day_workweek">From the AP:</a></p>
<blockquote><p>SALT LAKE CITY – Closing Utah state offices on <span id="lw_1256229839_0">Fridays</span> has delivered an unexpected bonus: a big saving on overtime pay.</p>
<p>New calculations show Utah saved $4.1 million in the first year of a government experiment with a four-day workweek.</p>
<p>State employees were eager to leave after the longer workday, and weren&#8217;t inclined to work an extra hour or two.</p>
<p>&#8220;They&#8217;re getting what they need to get done in 10 hours and going home,&#8221; said Angie Welling, spokeswoman for Gov. Gary Herbert.</p>
<p>&#8220;The state envisioned some <span id="lw_1256229839_1">energy savings</span>, but that overtime number was not anticipated,&#8221; she said Wednesday.</p></blockquote>
  <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/economic101.wordpress.com/430/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/economic101.wordpress.com/430/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/economic101.wordpress.com/430/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/economic101.wordpress.com/430/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/economic101.wordpress.com/430/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/economic101.wordpress.com/430/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/economic101.wordpress.com/430/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/economic101.wordpress.com/430/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/economic101.wordpress.com/430/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/economic101.wordpress.com/430/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=economic101.wordpress.com&blog=6122294&post=430&subd=economic101&ref=&feed=1" /></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://economic101.wordpress.com/2009/10/22/4-day-workweek-benefits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/77327d371c2beaa0c915764f5879fe79?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2Fa.wordpress.com%2Fi%2Fmu.gif&#38;r=PG" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">sbalassi</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Upward Mobility from the WSJ</title>
		<link>http://economic101.wordpress.com/2009/10/20/upward-mobility-from-the-wsj/</link>
		<comments>http://economic101.wordpress.com/2009/10/20/upward-mobility-from-the-wsj/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 18:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sbalassi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://economic101.wordpress.com/?p=428</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Upward Mobility:  At the National Journal, Ronald Brownstein looks at a new book by Ron Haskins and Isabel Sawhill on upward mobility. “More than 60 percent of Americans whose parents scaled the top fifth of the income ladder have reached the top two-fifths themselves, Haskins and Sawhill found. By contrast, 65 percent of Americans with parents [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=economic101.wordpress.com&blog=6122294&post=428&subd=economic101&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><br /><p><a href="http://www.nationaljournal.com/njmagazine/politicalconnections.php" target="_blank"><strong>Upward Mobility:</strong></a>  At the National Journal, <strong>Ronald Brownstein</strong> looks at a new book by <strong>Ron Haskins </strong>and <strong>Isabel Sawhill</strong> on upward mobility. “More than 60 percent of Americans whose parents scaled the top fifth of the income ladder have reached the top two-fifths themselves, Haskins and Sawhill found. By contrast, 65 percent of Americans with parents from the lowest fifth of earners remain stuck in the bottom two-fifths. Though we venerate the American Dream, studies show that children born to low-income parents in the United States are more likely to remain trapped near the bottom than their counterparts in Europe, the authors report. Many factors constrain upward mobility in America, including the decline of the two-parent family and bad personal decisions such as teen parenthood. But another reason the escalator is slowing for many on the bottom is that income is now so dependent on education. Today, four-year college graduates earn about 80 percent more than workers with high school degrees. That’s more than double the gap in the 1960s.”</p>
  <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/economic101.wordpress.com/428/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/economic101.wordpress.com/428/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/economic101.wordpress.com/428/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/economic101.wordpress.com/428/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/economic101.wordpress.com/428/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/economic101.wordpress.com/428/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/economic101.wordpress.com/428/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/economic101.wordpress.com/428/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/economic101.wordpress.com/428/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/economic101.wordpress.com/428/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=economic101.wordpress.com&blog=6122294&post=428&subd=economic101&ref=&feed=1" /></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://economic101.wordpress.com/2009/10/20/upward-mobility-from-the-wsj/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/77327d371c2beaa0c915764f5879fe79?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2Fa.wordpress.com%2Fi%2Fmu.gif&#38;r=PG" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">sbalassi</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>California&#8217;s Unemployment Rate Declines</title>
		<link>http://economic101.wordpress.com/2009/10/16/californias-unemployment-rate-declines/</link>
		<comments>http://economic101.wordpress.com/2009/10/16/californias-unemployment-rate-declines/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 18:42:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sbalassi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://economic101.wordpress.com/?p=426</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[California&#8217;s unemployment rate dropped to 12.2 percent in September. It was 12.3 percent in August (they did revise the August number to 12.2 percent). There is some stability in this rate now, hopefully, it will start to go down soon.
       <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=economic101.wordpress.com&blog=6122294&post=426&subd=economic101&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='snap_preview'><br /><p>California&#8217;s unemployment rate dropped to 12.2 percent in September. It was 12.3 percent in August (they did revise the August number to 12.2 percent). There is some stability in this rate now, hopefully, it will start to go down soon.</p>
  <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/economic101.wordpress.com/426/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/economic101.wordpress.com/426/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/economic101.wordpress.com/426/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/economic101.wordpress.com/426/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/economic101.wordpress.com/426/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/economic101.wordpress.com/426/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/economic101.wordpress.com/426/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/economic101.wordpress.com/426/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/economic101.wordpress.com/426/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/economic101.wordpress.com/426/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=economic101.wordpress.com&blog=6122294&post=426&subd=economic101&ref=&feed=1" /></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://economic101.wordpress.com/2009/10/16/californias-unemployment-rate-declines/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/77327d371c2beaa0c915764f5879fe79?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2Fa.wordpress.com%2Fi%2Fmu.gif&#38;r=PG" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">sbalassi</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>